November 29, 2006 hearing
Judge A. Milisauskes was in a very tough predicament. I thought surely he will abide by the laws of land, the state statutes, and the rules and facts that I've compiled together and stapled into a book.
He immediately told me that he cannot do an Appeal in his courtroom. I chose the wrong color (blue) for the cover of my booklet. I also used the word "appeal" on the cover, because I was appealing to him to look at the facts of this case. Should I have used a different word for this technicality? If I would have used the phrase that I am entreating him to look at my case, would he have shot me down because he is not a Treaty Court? He only does Circuit Court. I Bernie, "Circuit Court" you to look at these facts?
Hind sight now tells me that I should have said "excuse me, which book did I give you?" And get it in my hands to look at it. Once in my hands I should have said, "I'm sorry, you were right, I did give you the wrong booklet." Then before his eyes, swiftly rip the front cover off of it and hand back to him. I then tell him, "that was my mistake, this is the right one!"
The tough predicament is this. In that booklet I have several pages of my Transcripts. I have the entire download off of my web site, the "is she just?" article. Please read that one, by clicking on the Mary K. Wagner link. Especially read page 3, and 4. That is the tough predicament that the Kenosha Court is in. If they look at the facts there, then I would be innocent without this massive debt. If those numbers are true that the whole thing was wrong from the beginning then I was wrongfully imprisoned, then the courts need to pay restitution.
Therefore, it was easier for them to violate my 14th Amendment right, of courts performing in due process of order, than admit they are wrong. It was because of that, that judge Milisauskes refused to go past the front BLUE cover. However, he did go past the front cover because I mailed it to him at least a week earlier, so he could read all the screw-ups that Wagner had done.
The book continued with all my IRS 1040 forms of the previous year. Another thing in the booklet was the download sheet "screwed up" child support. That was for 2005 and Randy and David were listed against me, who were in my custody. After that sheet I included this year's sheet of who I am paying Child support on. This year I am paying on eleven people. The list starts with my wife then goes to my five children that are with her. Next I am paying on Bernard! I am paying Child support on myself! Then my two boys are listed who are in my custody. They are twenty and eighteen now. And then two of my other children are listed again. I am paying Child support on the 11 children! I am a pretty big kid, therefore I pay on myself, too!
The booklet also contain my request of adjusting all these mistakes and more time with my children. I ended the booklet with some of my medical bills and proof of my Lyme Disease. There are ten Western blots(tests?) If you have five out of ten, you definitely have Lyme Disease. I have nine out of ten!
However, struggling under sickness for the past fifteen months is no excuse to not have paid the $56,000 for the last four years. I spent one year in jail so it is exactly three productive years.
The Kenosha Court System wants to put me in jail because I was sick with Lyme disease. At least they will pay all my medical bills and Child Support for me when I am locked up. LOL!
I wonder if my transcript of that hearing will include me saying, "forget the cover, focus on the contents." I wonder if I can even get the transcript. Many victims of the Kenosha Court System get denied or get the run around, and then never get them.
Many things that Judge Wagner has said needs to remain from the hands of the victim, because if it gets on this web site, she will be in trouble. It is easier for her to tell the reporter to alter and then delete things from them before releasing them. She did that for me. I can prove that.
I just want to mention one more ironic thing in Milisaukes' Courtroom. After saying he can only do Circuit Court Hearings he went on to say that he also can't do a first hearing. It has to be done in front of the Commissioner first. He emphasized that several times.
He told his Clerk to e-mail over to Commissioner Plous a time request for him to look at this case, because it has to be in front of him first. I mentioned that this is what the family Clerk of Courts set up. I didn't set up my Hearing with him, they did! Did they violate the rules? Do they need to be investigated for malpractice?
After no response from e-mail or fax, the secretary left to the back room to call Plous. Within a couple minutes she came back and motioned to the judge to come to the back. Then they both came back in the court room. Judge Wagner had disqualified herself from my case about two months ago. And now it gets announced that Commissioner Plous disqualified himself from my case also. Wow! Two down.
A few minutes earlier Judge Milsauskes said that he can't do my case before a Commissioner looks at it. However, the rules just changed because now he will do the hearing on February 7, 2007. Why couldn't I get it now? Did he lie when he said he couldn't do it? Or is he going to perform something illegal on February 7th?
Next: Another Corrupt Battle plan by the Courts